a novel by JOHN GRABOWSKI

Taylor Swift shakes Apple off…

Taylor Swift

I never thought I would become a member of the Taylor Swift Fan Club, but I am.

The pop diva took on Apple, the world’s biggest corporation, and won.

For a quick recap, Apple decided it would not compensate artists for a three-month trial of its new streaming music service. Apple didn’t say it would eat the cost. It passed the burden on to the people supplying the content.

Any freelance writer or other creative person should know what this feel like, even if they’re not in a band or a pop star. Content so often is supposed to be free.

I’ve seen social events that paid DJs nice sums for standing in front of a laptop and clicking buttons but expects schooled musicians playing live music to work for free. And the event planners don’t see anything wrong with that.

Taylor had another opinion, and she voiced it in an open letter to Apple. She withdrew a new album from the service—not because she can’t shoulder the financial burden of no royalties but because it disproportionately impacts new artists who really do need every dollar. “We don’t ask you for free iPhones,” she said. “Please don’t ask us to provide you with our music for no compensation.”

It worked. In less than a day, Apple reversed itself. Well, what it actually said was it hadn’t really planned on stiffing artists after all, it was just going to pay them more later and that would make up any difference. Right.

This is hardly unique to Apple. A while ago McDonalds was the recipient of ire when it refused to pay for music at a major event. As is typical in situations like these, they say the “exposure” is worth more than hard cash. Try that one on your landlord.

Time coverWhile I’m indifferent to her teeny-bop music, I’m glad someone of Swift’s magnitude is calling attention to what’s becoming a very common assumption: that creative people—unless they’re megastars—should give away their efforts for nothing or very little. From Amazon’s unfair deals for authors to various publishing house ebook controversies, the much-ballyhooed “creative class” is largely getting the short end of the deal, while people who bring little to the table but control the pipes make rules that benefit only them. Taylor Swift brought that to the national consciousness yesterday, and despite petty carping from a few quarters most people are praising her actions. Keep shaking, baby.

spacer1

Advertisements

5 responses

  1. Respect to Taylor!

    Every Artist should be paid!

    Like

    June 23, 2015 at 10:23 am

    • Erica Mossel

      Word!

      Like

      June 23, 2015 at 12:01 pm

  2. Erica Mossel

    Great article! It’s about time there was an artists uprising. And the big name artists have to lead the way.

    Like

    June 23, 2015 at 11:52 am

  3. malikpiano

    And she donated 100 grand to her local symphony so how can you not like her (I don’t care about her music at all)

    mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/artsbeat/2013/12/16/taylor-swift-donates-100000-to-nashville-symphony/?_r=0&referrer=

    Like

    July 25, 2015 at 11:12 pm

    • malikpiano

      I suspect her phone number is just about as easy to get as Welsey’s

      Like

      July 25, 2015 at 11:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s